I’m not going to comment on the software, as I’m still downloading it as I type this entry. And other sites are doing a great job of covering today’s Apple press conference, so I’m not going to give Apple more free PR if I can help it. I mean, unless they want to pay me.

But I would like to point out one important catch. The fancy new textbook authoring software that Apple is giving away, iBooks Author, comes with a big restriction in its license agreement, and it’s that you can only sell your textbook in Apple’s iBooks store. (Click image for full-size screenshot of the license from the App Store page.) If you want to give your new textbook away for free, Apple has no problem with that. But if you want to sell it yourself or use some other retailer, no dice. You go through iBooks, meaning through Apple, and you give Apple a cut of the profits. Or you don’t use iBooks Author to make your fancy new digital textbook.

That, of course, is why iBooks Author is free. It’s sort of like if the company started giving away Pages, but required that all novels typed with the app belonged to the Apple Store.

So download it, play with it, learn from it. But take a good look at the terms before you invest any real labor in using it, because whatever you end up producing is going to be under Apple’s control for a long, long time.

If you’ve read reviews about the nook, the new Kindle competitor from Barnes & Noble, you may have heard that you can lend ebooks to friends. But don’t get suckered in by this claim. Barnes & Noble is conveniently leaving out some crucial information about how the process works, and it turns out the “loan your book” feature is a lot less useful than most bloggers and journalists are making it sound.

So how does the lending feature work? Barnes & Noble doesn’t provide a lot of detail on it–the Nook promo page on barnesandnoble.com simply says the device “lets you loan eBooks to friends, free of charge.” Naturally your friends will also all have to have registered nooks to participate, but I’ll assume that’s evident to most consumers.

But here’s the trickier part. Some readers over at the MobileRead forums asked Barnes & Noble to clarify how lending would work, and they found out the following details:

• You can only lend an ebook if the publisher allows it; this can be turned off exactly like how publishers can turn off the text-to-speech feature on Kindle titles.
• You can only lend an ebook out for 14 days maximum.
• You can only lend an ebook once; after that, lending is permanently disabled on the title.

The first condition is ridiculous, but I don’t want to hijack my own post just to rail some more about stupid/greedy publishers. Some people won’t have a problem with the other two conditions, either because their friends are fast readers or because they rarely lend physical copies of books more than once. But for the rest of us, watch out. For example, say you loan your mom your copy of The Road and she doesn’t finish it within that 2 week window; she’ll have to go buy her own copy to get through the last few chapters. You won’t be able to lend it to her for a second 14-day period, and you’ll never be able to lend it to anyone else ever again, either.

Barnes & Noble could make this feature actually usable with just a couple of small changes. They could expand the lending window to 30 days, plenty of time for most people to get through an average book. More useful, they could expand the number of times you can loan out a book, say to five instances. That would provide enough flexibility so that you and your friend can decide how long the loan should last.

But it’s unlikely Barnes & Noble will bother. You see, the real point of this feature isn’t for customers at all–it’s for Barnes & Noble, because it gives the company a ton of positive, free press: “Wow, the nook lets you lend books! The Kindle doesn’t do that!”

So take all the hype with a grain of salt, and remember that if you want to really find out the details of a new device these days, look on forums and message boards. That’s where actual target customers are likely to come together and ask the hard questions, even if the media doesn’t.

This post originally appeared on Kindlerama.com.

Uh oh, Amazon took my books back.

I must admit, it’s hard for me to come to terms with the idea of a company retaining any control over something I’ve paid for, even though networked devices by their nature must participate within a larger group. I suspect this will be one of those attitudes that dates me as future generations grow up within such a system and learn to accept it. But books are a special case in that they can contain revolutionary, heretical, or otherwise controversial ideas, which is the sort of stuff that people in power, or people seeking power, like to control. Call me crazy and paranoid, but I never want a government or legal agency wielding power over my books. Never.

“Amazon Clarifies When It Will Remove Kindle Books” [Consumerist] (Photo: alshain49)